About a week ago, my dog had an unfortunately run-in with another dog - who we know and is usually friendly - that resulted in him getting nipped pretty hard in his side. Wasn't too bad, but deep enough that it couldn't be left to heal on its own, particularly as the other dog had been carrying around a dead carcass of something or other in its mouth just prior (hence the nip, as my dog got interested and the other dog got defensive about their new prize).
It was late at night when we noticed the injury, so we took him to the emergency veterinary clinic to avoid letting him sit with it overnight. We were hoping for a quick clean-out and stitch, but because our dog is giant, easily frightened, and we couldn't rule out a bad contamination from the bite, the vet quite reasonably want to explore the wound under light sedation. We were given a quote before going ahead with anything and the final bill lined up with that quote perfectly, about $500.
In short, it was professional, competent care with excellent price transparency.
And yet, I'm in a very fortunate position to be able to afford that $500 of care. Many people couldn't, especially for a pet. If I was in a worse economic situation, I could have had to gamble that my dog would heal on his own. With his small wound, he would likely have done just fine, but it would still involve an element of risk for his well-being.
Why do I bring this up? Well, because private healthcare is back in the mix in Canada.
Now, "private healthcare" is about as vague a term as you can get. Canadian health services are largely provided by private organizations, just funded from mostly public sources. Yet most people wouldn't call Canadian healthcare private. Likewise, when discussing current efforts to allow private billing of provincially-insured healthcare services, there are a multitude of schemes that could be considered. Furthermore, when the Canadian healthcare system gets compared to other countries' systems with private components, it often gets forgotten that those countries actually have more government funding as a proportion of medical expenses than Canada does.
Therefore, when I speak of the encroachment of private healthcare in Canada, it's hard to do so without oversimplifying the debate, and I want to acknowledge that before going any further on this point.
Currently, there are more than a few physician groups and individual physicians expressing support for allowing private billing for otherwise publicly-covered healthcare services. In some cases, physicians have already opened such clinics and are operating them with questionable legality. One BC lawsuit is currently underway concerning such a clinic, this one focused on outpatient surgeries. In my experience thus far, a desire for a private option, or at least a belief that it is necessary, helpful, or inevitable, is a popular opinion among physicians. The notion is that private care could cover something lacking in our current public system, even if it's as simple as providing additional capacity for elective procedures.
My objection is that no matter the formulation, unless we dramatically reshape the public system as well, private care will provide some services of consequence to outcomes to some who can pay, but not to others who cannot. The only alternative is if private care adds no value whatsoever, in which case, what's the point? I felt enough worry about having to cover the costs for care of my dog with a condition that was relatively safe, with expenses I could afford, and when everything about his care went perfectly. To have to make that decision with a higher cost, a more serious condition, and the real possibility of sub-optimal outcomes would be so much worse. To make that decision for a human - myself or another loved one - would be even more difficult, as much as I love my dog. I also never want to be on the other side of this situation, having to ask patients to choose between their physical and financial health. For pets and other animals, these sorts of decisions are unavoidable - I don't think we'll ever have universal veterinary care. Yet, we can avoid these decisions for people, if we maintain and strengthen the public system we have now.
For the record, my dog is now fine. His wound is healing well with no signs of infection. He was a little anxious for the first day or two and is pretty upset that he has to wear a cone, but he's more or less back to his old, affectionate self!
No comments:
Post a Comment